
In Cambridge there are two literary shrines to which visitors are
sure to find their way soon after passing the Harvard gates, "Craigie
House," the home of Longfellow and "Elmwood," the home of
Lowell. Though their hallowed retirement has been profaned by the
encroachments of the growing city, yet in their simple dignity these
fine old colonial mansions still bespeak the noble associations of the
past, and stand as memorials of the finest products of American
culture.
Elmwood was built before the Revolution by Thomas Oliver, the
Tory governor, who signed his abdication at the invitation of a
committee of "about four thousand people" who surrounded his
house at Cambridge. The property was confiscated by the
Commonwealth and used by the American army during the war. In
1818 it was purchased by the Rev. Charles Lowell, pastor of the
West Congregational Church in Boston, and after ninety years it is
still the family home. Here was born, February 22, 1819, James
Russell Lowell, with surroundings most propitious for the nurturing
of a poet-soul. Within the stately home there was a refined family
life; the father had profited by the unusual privilege of three years'
study abroad, and his library of some four thousand volumes was
not limited to theology; the mother, whose maiden name was
Spence and who traced her Scotch ancestry back to the hero of the
ballad of Sir Patrick Spens , taught her children the good old
ballads and the romantic stories in the Fairie Queen , and it was one
of the poet's earliest delights to recount the adventures of Spenser's
heroes and heroines to his playmates.
An equally important influence upon his early youth was the out-of-
door life at Elmwood. To the love of nature his soul was early
dedicated, and no American poet has more truthfully and
beautifully interpreted the inspired teachings of nature, whispered
through the solemn tree-tops or caroled by the happy birds. The
open fields surrounding Elmwood and the farms for miles around
were his familiar playground, and furnished daily adventures for
his curious and eager mind. The mere delight of this experience
with nature, he says, "made my childhood the richest part of my life.
It seems to me as if I had never seen nature again since those old
days when the balancing of a yellow butterfly over a thistle bloom
was spiritual food and lodging for a whole forenoon." In
the Cathedral is an autobiographic passage describing in a series of
charming pictures some of those choice hours of childhood:
"One summer hour abides, what time I perched,Dappled with
noonday, under simmering leaves,And pulled the pulpy oxhearts,
while aloofAn oriole clattered and the robins shrilled,Denouncing
me an alien and a thief."
Quite like other boys Lowell was subjected to the processes of the
more formal education of books. He was first sent to a "dame
school," and then to the private school of William Wells, under
whose rigid tuition he became thoroughly grounded in the classics.
Among his schoolfellows was W.W. Story, the poet-sculptor, who
continued his life-long friend. Thomas Wentworth Higginson, who
was one of the younger boys of the school, recalls the high talk of
Story and Lowell about the Fairie Queen . At fifteen he entered
Harvard College, then aninstitution with about two hundred
students. The course of study in those days was narrow and dull, a
pretty steady diet of Greek, Latin and Mathematics, with an
occasional
dessert
of
Paley's Evidences
of
Christianity or
Butler's Analogy . Lowell was not distinguished for scholarship, but
he read omnivorously and wrote copiously, often in smooth flowing
verse, fashioned after the accepted English models of the period. He
was an editor of Harvardiana , the college magazine, and was elected
class poet in his senior year. But his habit of lounging with the poets
in the secluded alcoves of the old library, in preference to attending
recitations, finally became too scandalous for official forbearance,
and he was rusticated, "on account of constant neglect of his college
duties," as the faculty records state. He was sent to Concord, where
his exile was not without mitigating profit, as he became acquainted
with Emerson and Thoreau. Here he wrote the class poem, which he
was permitted to circulate in print at his Commencement. This
production, which now stands at the head of the list of his published
works, was curiously unprophetic of his later tendencies. It was
written in the neatly, polished couplets of the Pope type and other
imitative metres, and aimed to satirize the radical movements of the
period, especially the transcendentalists and abolitionists, with both
of whom he was soon to be in active sympathy.
Lowell's first two years out of college were troubled with rather
more than the usual doubts and questionings that attend a young
man's choice of a profession. He studied for a bachelor's degree in
law, which he obtained in two years. But the work was done
reluctantly. Law books, he says, "I am reading with as few wry faces
as I may." Though he was nominally practicing law for two years,
there is no evidence that he ever had a client, except the fictitious
one so pleasantly described in his first magazine article, entitled My
First Client . From Coke and Blackstone his mind would inevitably
slip away to hold more congenial communion with the poets. He
became intensely interested in the old English dramatists, an interest
that resulted in his first series of literary articles, The Old English
Dramatists , published in the Boston Miscellany . The favor with which
these articles were received increased, he writes, the "hope of being
able one day to support myself by my pen, and to leave a calling
which I hate, and for which I am not well fitted, to say the least."
During this struggle between law and literature an influence came
into Lowell's life that settled his purposes, directed his aspirations
and essentially determined his career. In 1839 he writes to a friend
about a "very pleasant young lady," who "knows more poetry than
any one I am acquainted with." This pleasant young lady was Maria
White, who became his wife in 1844. The loves of this young couple
constitute one of the most pleasing episodes in the history of our
literature, idyllic in its simple beauty and inspiring in its spiritual
perfectness. "Miss White was a woman of unusual loveliness," says
Mr. Norton, "and of gifts of mind and heart still more unusual,
which enabled her to enter with complete sympathy into her lover's
intellectual life and to direct his genius to its highest aims." She was
herself a poet, and a little volume of her poems published privately
after her death is an evidence of her refined intellectual gifts and
lofty spirit.
In 1841 Lowell published his first collection of poems, entitled A
Year's Life . The volume was dedicated to "Una," a veiled admission
of indebtedness for its inspiration to Miss White. Two poems
particularly, Irene and My Love , and the best in the volume, are
rapturous expressions of his new inspiration. In later years he
referred to the collection as "poor windfalls of unripe experience."
Only nine of the sixty-eight poems were preserved in subsequent
collections. In 1843, with a young friend, Robert Carter, Lowell
launched a new magazine, The Pioneer , with the high purpose, as the
prospectus stated, of giving the public "a rational substitute" for the
"namby-pamby love tales and sketches monthly poured out to them
by many of our popular magazines." These young reformers did not
know how strongly the great reading public is attached to its
literary flesh-pots, and so the Pioneer proved itself too good to live in
just three months. The result of the venture to Lowell was an
interesting lesson in editorial work and a debt of eighteen hundred
dollars. His next venture was a second volume of Poems , issued in
1844, in which the permanent lines of his poetic development
appear more clearly than in A Year's Life . The tone of the first
volume was uniformly serious, but in the second his muse's face
begins to brighten with the occasional play of wit and humor. The
volume was heartily praised by the critics and his reputation as a
new poet of convincing distinction was established. In the following
year appeared Conversations on Some of the Old Poets , a volume of
literary criticism interesting now mainly as pointing to maturer
work in this field.
It is generally stated that the influence of Maria White made Lowell
an Abolitionist, but this is only qualifiedly true. A year before he
had met her he wrote to a friend: "The Abolitionists are the only
ones with whom I sympathize of the present extant parties."
Freedom, justice, humanitarianism were fundamental to his native
idealism. Maria White's enthusiasm and devotion to the cause
served to crystallize his sentiments and to stimulate him to a
practical participation in the movement. Both wrote for the Liberty
Bell , an annual published in the interests of the anti-slavery
agitation. Immediately after their marriage they went to
Philadelphia where Lowell for a time was an editorial writer for
the Pennsylvania Freeman , an anti-slavery journal once edited by
Whittier. During the next six years he was a regular contributor to
the Anti-Slavery Standard , published in New York. In all of this prose
writing Lowell exhibited the ardent spirit of the reformer, although
he never adopted the extreme views of Garrison and others of the
ultra-radical wing of the party.
But Lowell's greatest contribution to the anti-slavery cause was
the Biglow Papers , a series of satirical poems in the Yankee dialect,
aimed at the politicians who were responsible for the Mexican War,
a war undertaken, as he believed, in the interests of the Southern
slaveholders. Hitherto the Abolitionists had been regarded with
contempt by the conservative, complacent advocates of peace and
"compromise," and to join them was essentially to lose caste in the
best society. But now a laughing prophet had arisen whose tongue
was tipped with fire. The Biglow Papers was an unexpected blow to
the slave power. Never before had humor been used directly as a
weapon in political warfare. Soon the whole country was ringing
with the homely phrases of Hosea Biglow's satiric humor, and
deriding conservatism began to change countenance. "No speech, no
plea, no appeal," says George William Curtis, "was comparable in
popular and permanent effect with this pitiless tempest of fire and
hail, in the form of wit, argument, satire, knowledge, insight,
learning, common-sense, and patriotism. It was humor of the purest
strain, but humor in deadly earnest." As an embodiment of the
elemental Yankee character and speech it is a classic of final
authority. Says Curtis, "Burns did not give to the Scotch tongue a
nobler immortality than Lowell gave to the dialect of New England."
The year 1848 was one of remarkably productive results for Lowell.
Besides the Biglow Papers and some forty magazine articles and
poems, he published a third collection of Poems , the Vision of Sir
Launfal , and the Fable for Critics . The various phases of his composite
genius were nearly all represented in these volumes. The Fable was a
good-natured satire upon his fellow authors, in which he touched
up in rollicking rhymed couplets the merits and weaknesses of each,
not omitting himself, with witty characterization and acute critical
judgment; and it is still read for its delicious humor and sterling
criticism. For example, the lines on Poe will always be quoted:
"There comes Poe, with his raven, like Barnaby Rudge,
Three-fifths of him genius and two-fifths sheer fudge."
And so the sketch of Hawthorne:
"There is Hawthorne, with genius so shrinking and rareThat you
hardly at first see the strength that is there;A frame so robust, with a
nature so sweet,So earnest, so graceful, so lithe and so fleet,Is worth
a descent from Olympus to meet."
Lowell was now living in happy content at Elmwood. His father,
whom he once speaks of as a "Dr. Primrose in the comparative
degree," had lost a large portion of his property, and literary
journals in those days sent very small checks to young authors. So
humble frugality was an attendant upon the high thinking of the
poet couple, but this did not matter, since the richest objects of their
ideal world could be had without price. But clouds suddenly
gathered over their beautiful lives. Four children were born, three of
whom died in infancy. Lowell's deep and lasting grief for his first-
born is tenderly recorded in the poems She Came and Went and
the First Snow-Fall . The volume of poems published in 1848 was
"reverently dedicated" to the memory of "our little Blanche," and in
the introductory poem addressed "To M.W.L." he poured forth his
sorrow like a libation of tears:
"I thought our love at fall, but I did err;
Joy's wreath drooped o'er mine eyes: I could not see
That sorrow in our happy world must be
Love's deepest spokesman and interpreter."
The year 1-2 was spent abroad for the benefit of Mrs. Lowell's
health, which was now precarious. At Rome their little son Walter
died, and one year after their return to Elmwood sorrow's crown of
sorrow came to the poet in the death of Mrs. Lowell, October, 3. For
years after the dear old home was to him The Dead House , as he
wrote of it:
"For it died that autumn morningWhen she, its soul, was borneTo lie
all dark on the hillsideThat looks over woodland and corn."
Before 4 Lowell's literary success had been won mainly in verse.
With the appearance in the magazines of A Moosehead
Journal , Fireside Travels , and Leaves from My Italian Journal his success
as a prose essayist began. Henceforth, and against his will, his prose
was a stronger literary force than his poetry. He now gave a course
of lectures on the English poets at the Lowell Institute, and during
the progress of these lectures he received notice of his appointment
to succeed Longfellow in the professorship of the French and
Spanish languages and Belles-Lettres in Harvard College. A year
was spent in Europe in preparation for his new work, and during
the next twenty years he faithfully performed the duties of the
professorship, pouring forth the ripening fruits of his varied studies
in lectures such as it is not often the privilege of college students to
hear. That pulling in the yoke of this steady occupation was
sometimes galling is shown in his private letters. To W.D. Howells
he wrote regretfully of the time and energy given to teaching, and of
his conviction that he would have been a better poet if he "had not
estranged the muse by donning a professor's gown." But a good
teacher always bears in his left hand the lamp of sacrifice.
In 7 Lowell was married to Miss Frances Dunlap, "a woman of
remarkable gifts and grace of person and character," says Charles
Eliot Norton. In the same year the Atlantic Monthly was launched
and Lowell became its first editor. This position he held four years.
Under his painstaking and wise management the magazine quickly
became what it has continued to be, the finest representative of true
literature among periodicals. In 1864 he joined his friend, Professor
Norton, in the editorship of the North American Review , to which he
gave much of the distinction for which this periodical was once so
worthily famous. In this first appeared his masterly essays on the
great poets, Chaucer, Dante, Shakespeare, Spenser, Milton, Dryden,
and the others, which were gathered into the three volumes, Among
My Books , first and second series, and My Study Windows . Variety
was given to this critical writing by such charming essays as A Good
Word for Winter and the deliciously caustic paper On a Certain
Condescension in Foreigners .
One of the strongest elements of Lowell's character was patriotism.
His love of country and his native soil was not merely a principle, it
was a passion. No American author has done so much to enlarge
and exalt the ideals of democracy. An intense interest in the welfare
of the nation broadened the scope of his literary work and led him
at times into active public life. During the Civil War he published a
second series of Biglow Papers , in which, says Mr. Greenslet, "we feel
the vital stirring of the mind of Lowell as it was moved by the great
war; and if they never had quite the popular reverberation of the
first series, they made deeper impression, and are a more priceless
possession of our literature." When peace was declared in April, 1,
he wrote to Professor Norton: "The news, my dear Charles, is from
Heaven. I felt a strange and tender exaltation. I wanted to laugh and
I wanted to cry, and ended by holding my peace and feeling
devoutly thankful. There is something magnificent in having a
country to love." On July 21 a solemn service was held at Harvard
College in memory of her sons who had died in the war, in which
Lowell gave the Commemoration Ode , a poem which is now
regarded, not as popular, but as marking the highest reach of his
poetic power. The famous passage characterizing Lincoln is
unquestionably the finest tribute ever paid to Lincoln by an
American author.
In the presidential campaign of 1876 Lowell was active, making
speeches, serving as delegate to the Republican Convention, and
later as Presidential Elector. There was even much talk of sending
him to Congress. Through the friendly offices of Mr. Howells, who
was in intimate personal relations with President Hayes, he was
appointed Minister to Spain. This honor was the more gratifying to
him because he had long been devoted to the Spanish literature and
language, and he could now read his beloved Calderon with new
joys. In 1 he was promoted to the English mission, and during the
next four years represented his country at the Court of St. James in a
manner that raised him to the highest point of honor and esteem in
both nations. His career in England was an extraordinary, in most
respects an unparalleled success. He was our first official
representative to win completely the heart of the English people,
and a great part of his permanent achievement was to establish
more cordial relations between the two countries. His literary
reputation had prepared the ground for his personal popularity. He
was greeted as "His Excellency the Ambassador of American
Literature to the Court of Shakespeare." His fascinating personality
won friends in every circle of society. Queen Victoria declared that
during her long reign no ambassador had created so much interest
or won so much regard. He had already been honored by degrees
from Oxford and Cambridge, and now many similar honors were
thrust upon him. He was acknowledged to be the best after-dinner
speaker in England, and no one was called upon so often for
addresses at dedications, the unveiling of tablets, and other civic
occasions. It is not strange that he became attached to England with
an increasing affection, but there was no diminution of his intense
Americanism. His celebrated Birmingham address on Democracy is
yet our clearest and noblest exposition of American political
principles and ideals.
With the inauguration of Cleveland in 1 Lowell's official residence
in England came to an end. He returned to America and for a time
lived with his daughter at Deerfoot Farm. Mrs. Lowell had died in
England, and he could not carry his sorrow back to Elmwood alone.
He now leisurely occupied himself with literary work, making an
occasional address upon literature or politics, which was always
distinguished by grace and dignity of style and richness of thought.
In November, 1886, he delivered the oration at the th anniversary of
the founding of Harvard University, and, rising to the requirements
of this notable occasion, he captivated his hearers, among whom
were many distinguished delegates from the great universities of
Europe as well as of America, by the power of his thought and the
felicity of his expression.
During the period of his diplomatic service he added almost nothing
to his permanent literary product. In 1869 he had published Under
the Willows , a collection that contains some of his finest poems. In
the same year The Cathedral was published, a stately poem in blank
verse, profound in thought, with many passages of great poetic
beauty. In 1888 a final collection of poems was published,
entitled Heartsease and Rue , which opened with the memorial
poem, Agassiz , an elegy that would not be too highly honored by
being bound in a golden volume with Lycidas , Adonais and Thyrsis .
Going back to his earliest literary studies, he again (1887) lectured at
the Lowell Institute on the old dramatists, Occasionally he gave a
poem to the magazines and a collection of these Last Poems was
made in 1 by Professor Norton. During these years were written
many of the charming Letters to personal friends, which rank with
the finest literary letters ever printed and must always be regarded
as an important part of his prose works.
It was a gracious boon of providence that Lowell was permitted to
spend his last years at Elmwood, with his daughter, Mrs. Burnett,
and his grandchildren. There again, as in the early days, he watched
the orioles building their nests and listened to the tricksy catbird's
call. To an English friend he writes: "I watch the moon rise behind
the same trees through which I first saw it seventy years ago and
have a strange feeling of permanence, as if I should watch it seventy
years longer." In the old library by the familiar fireplace he sat,
when the shadows were playing among his beloved books,
communing with the beautiful past. What unwritten poems of
pathos and sweetness may have ministered to his great soul we
cannot know. In 1 a fatal disease came upon him, and after long and
heroic endurance of pain he died, August 12, 1891, and under the
trees of Mt. Auburn he rests, as in life still near his great neighbor
Longfellow. In a memorial poem Oliver Wendell Holmes spoke for
the thousands who mourned:
"Peace to thy slumber in the forest shade,
Poet and patriot, every gift was thine;
Thy name shall live while summers bloom and fade
And grateful memory guard thy leafy shrine."
Lowell's rich and varied personality presents a type of cultured
manhood that is the finest product of American democracy. The
largeness of his interests and the versatility of his intellectual
powers give him a unique eminence among American authors. His
genius was undoubtedly embarrassed by the diffusive tendency of
his interests. He might have been a greater poet had he been less the
reformer and statesman, and his creative impulses were often
absorbed in the mere enjoyment of exercising his critical faculty.
Although he achieved only a qualified eminence as poet, or as prose
writer, yet because of the breadth and variety of his permanent
achievement he must be regarded as our greatest man of letters. His
sympathetic interest, always outflowing toward concrete humanity,
was a quality—
"With such large range as from the ale-house benchCan reach the
stars and be with both at home."
With marvelous versatility and equal ease he could talk with the
down-east farmer and salty seamen and exchange elegant
compliments with old world royalty. In The Cathedral he says
significantly:
"I thank benignant nature most for this,—
A force of sympathy, or call it lack
Of character firm-planted, loosing me
From the pent chamber of habitual self
To dwell enlarged in alien modes of thought,
Haply distasteful, wholesomer for that,
And through imagination to possess,
As they were mine, the lives of other men."
In the delightful little poem, The Nightingale in the Study , we have a
fanciful expression of the conflict between Lowell's love of books
and love of nature. His friend the catbird calls him "out beneath the
unmastered sky," where the buttercups "brim with wine beyond all
Lesbian juice." But there are ampler skies, he answers, "in Fancy's
land," and the singers though dead so long—
"Give its best sweetness to all song.
To nature's self her better glory."
His love of reading is manifest in all his work, giving to his style a
bookishness that is sometimes excessive and often troublesome. His
expression, though generally direct and clear, and happily colored
by personal frankness, is often burdened with learning. To be able to
read his essays with full appreciation is in itself evidence of a liberal
education. His scholarship was broad and profound, but it was not
scholarship in the German sense, exhaustive and exhausting. He
studied for the joy of knowing, never for the purpose of being
known, and he cared more to know the spirit and meaning of things
than to know their causes and origins. A language he learned for the
sake of its literature rather than its philology. As Mr. Brownell
observes, he shows little interest in the large movements of the
world's history. He seemed to prefer history as sublimated in the
poet's song. The field of belles-lettres was his native province; its
atmosphere was most congenial to his tastes. In book-land it was
always June for him—
"Springtime ne'er denied
Indoors by vernal Chaucer, whose fresh woods
Throb thick with merle and mavis all the year."
But books could never divert his soul from its early endearments
with out-of-door nature. "The older I grow," he says, "the more I am
convinced that there are no satisfactions so deep and so permanent
as our sympathies with outward nature." And in the preface to My
Study Windows he speaks of himself as "one who has always found
his most fruitful study in the open air." The most charming element
of his poetry is the nature element that everywhere cheers and
stimulates the reader. It is full of sunshine and bird music. So
genuine, spontaneous and sympathetic are his descriptions that we
feel the very heart throbs of nature in his verse, and in the prose of
such records of intimacies with outdoor friends as the essay, My
Garden Acquaintance . "How I do love the earth," he exclaims. "I feel it
thrill under my feet. I feel somehow as if it were conscious of my
love, as if something passed into my dancing blood from it." It is this
sensitive nearness to nature that makes him a better interpreter of
her "visible forms" than Bryant even; moreover, unlike Bryant he
always catches the notes of joy in nature's voices and feels the uplift
of a happy inspiration.
In the presence of the immense popularity of Mark Twain, it may
seem paradoxical to call Lowell our greatest American humorist. Yet
in the refined and artistic qualities of humorous writing and in the
genuineness of the native flavor his work is certainly superior to any
other humorous writing that is likely to compete with it for
permanent interest. Indeed, Mr. Greenslet thinks that "it is as the
author of the Biglow Papers that he is likely to be longest
remembered." The perpetual play of humor gave to his work, even
to the last, the freshness of youth. We love him for his boyish love of
pure fun. The two large volumes of his Letters are delicious reading
because he put into them "good wholesome nonsense," as he says,
"keeping my seriousness to bore myself with."
But this sparkling and overflowing humor never obscures the deep
seriousness that is the undercurrent of all his writing. A high
idealism characterizes all his work. One of his greatest services to
his country was the effort to create a saner and sounder political life.
As he himself realized, he often moralized his work too much with a
purposeful idealism. In middle life he said, "I shall never be a poet
until I get out of the pulpit, and New England was all meeting-
house when I was growing up." In religion and philosophy he was
conservative, deprecating the radical and scientific tendencies of the
age, with its knife and glass—
"That make thought physical and thrust far off
The Heaven, so neighborly with man of old,"
The moral impulse and the poetic impulse were often in conflict,
and much of his early poetry for this reason was condemned by his
later judgment. His maturer poems are filled with deep-thoughted
lines, phrases of high aspiration and soul-stirring ecstasies. Though
his thought is spiritual and ideal, it is always firmly rooted in the
experience of common humanity. All can climb the heights with him
and catch inspiring glimpses at least of the ideal and the infinite.
THE VISION OF SIR LAUNFAL
Early in 1848 in a letter to his friend Briggs, Lowell speaks of The
Vision of Sir Launfal as "a sort of story, and more likely to be
popular than what I write generally. Maria thinks very highly of it."
And in another letter he calls it "a little narrative poem." In
December, 1848, it was published in a thin volume alone, and at
once justified the poet's expectations of popularity. The poem was
an improvisation, like that of his "musing organist," for it was
written, we are told, almost at a single sitting, entirely within two
days. The theme may have been suggested by Tennyson's Sir
Galahad, but his familiarity with the old romances and his love of
the mystical and symbolic sense of these good old-time tales were a
quite ample source for such suggestion. Moreover Lowell in his
early years was much given to seeing visions and dreaming
dreams. "During that part of my life," he says, "which I lived most
alone, I was never a single night unvisited by visions, and once I
thought I had a personal revelation from God Himself." The Fairie
Queen was "the first poem I ever read," he says, and the bosky
glades of Elmwood were often transformed into an enchanted forest
where the Knight of the Red Cross, and Una and others in medieval
costume passed up and down before his wondering eyes. This
medieval romanticism was a perfectly natural accompaniment of his
intense idealism.
The Vision of Sir Launfal and the Fable for Critics, published in the
same year, illustrate the two dominant and strikingly contrasted
qualities of his nature, a contrast of opposites which he himself
clearly perceived. "I find myself very curiously compounded of two
utterly distinct characters. One half of me is clear mystic and
enthusiast, and the other, humorist," and he adds that "it would
have taken very little to have made a Saint Francis" of him. It was
the Saint Francis of New England, the moral and spiritual enthusiast
in Lowell's nature that produced the poem and gave it power. Thus
we see that notwithstanding its antique style and artificial structure,
it was a perfectly direct and spontaneous expression of himself.
The allegory of the Vision is easily interpreted, in its main
significance. There is nothing original in the lesson, the humility of
true charity, and it is a common criticism that the moral purpose of
the poem is lost sight of in the beautiful nature pictures. But a
knowledge of the events which were commanding Lowell's
attention at this time and quickening his native feelings into
purposeful utterance gives to the poem a much deeper significance.
In 1844, when the discussion over the annexation of Texas was
going on, he wrote The Present Crisis, a noble appeal to his
countrymen to improve and elevate their principles. During the next
four years he was writing editorially for the Standard, the official
organ of the Anti-Slavery Society, at the same time he was bringing
out the Biglow Papers. In all these forms of expression he voiced
constantly the sentiment of reform, which now filled his heart like a
holy zeal. The national disgrace of slavery rested heavily upon his
soul. He burned with the desire to make God's justice prevail where
man's justice had failed. In 1846 he said in a letter, "It seems as if my
heart would break in pouring out one glorious song that should be
the gospel of Reform, full of consolation and strength to the
oppressed, yet falling gently and restoringly as dew on the withered
youth-flowers of the oppressor. That way my madness lies, if any."
This passionate yearning for reform is embodied poetically in the
Vision. In a broad sense, therefore, the poem is an expression of
ideal democracy, in which equality, sympathy, and a sense of the
common brotherhood of man are the basis of all ethical actions and
standards. It is the Christ-like conception of human society that is
always so alluring in the poetry and so discouraging in the prose of
life.
The following explanation appeared in the early editions of the
poem as an introductory note:
"According to the mythology of the Romancers, the San Greal, or
Holy Grail, was the cup out of which Jesus Christ partook of the last
supper with his disciples. It was brought into England by Joseph of
Arimathea, and remained there, an object of pilgrimage and
adoration, for many years in the keeping of his lineal descendants. It
was incumbent upon those who had charge of it to be chaste in
thought, word, and deed; but, one of the keepers having broken this
condition, the Holy Grail disappeared. From that time it was a
favorite enterprise of the Knights of Arthur's court to go in search of
it. Sir Galahad was at last successful in finding it, as may be read in
the seventeenth book of the Romance of King Arthur. Tennyson has
made Sir Galahad the subject of one of the most exquisite of his
poems.
"The plot (if I may give that name to anything so slight) of the
following poem is my own, and, to serve its purposes, I have
enlarged the circle of competition in search of the miraculous cup in
such a manner as to include not only other persons than the heroes
of the Round Table, but also a period of time subsequent to the date
of King Arthur's reign."
In the last sentence there is a sly suggestion of Lowell's playfulness.
Of course every one may compete in the search for the Grail, and the
"time subsequent to King Arthur's reign" includes the present time.
The Romance of King Arthur is the Morte Darthur of Sir Thomas
Malory. Lowell's specific indebtedness to the medieval romances
extended only to the use of the symbol of consecration to some
noble purpose in the search for the Grail, and to the name of his
hero. It is a free version of older French romances belonging to the
Arthurian cycle. Sir Launfal is the title of a poem written by Sir
Thomas Chestre in the reign of Henry VI, which may be found in
Ritson's Ancient English Metrical Romances. There is nothing
suggestive of Lowell's poem except the quality of generosity in the
hero, who—
"gaf gyftys largelyche,
Gold and sylver; and clodes ryche,
To squyer and to knight."
One of Lowell's earlier poems, The Search, contains the germ of The
Vision of Sir Launfal. It represents a search for Christ, first in
nature's fair woods and fields, then in the "proud world" amid
"power and wealth," and the search finally ends in "a hovel rude"
where—
"The King I sought for meekly stood:
A naked, hungry child
Clung round his gracious knee,
And a poor hunted slave looked up and smiled
To bless the smile that set him free."
And Christ, the seeker learns, is not to be found by wandering
through the world.
"His throne is with the outcast and the weak."
A similar fancy also is embodied in a little poem entitled A Parable.
Christ goes through the world to see "How the men, my brethren,
believe in me," and he finds "in church, and palace, and judgment-
hall," a disregard for the primary principles of his teaching.
"Have ye founded your throne and altars, then,
On the bodies and souls of living men?
And think ye that building shall endure,
Which shelters the noble and crushes the poor?"
These early poems and passages in others written at about the same
time, taken in connection with the Vision, show how strongly the
theme had seized upon Lowell's mind.
The structure of the poem is complicated and sometimes confusing.
At the outset the student must notice that there is a story within a
story. The action of the major story covers only a single night, and
the hero of this story is the real Sir Launfal, who in his sleep dreams
the minor story, the Vision. The action of this story covers the
lifetime of the hero, the imaginary Sir Launfal, from early manhood
to old age, and includes his wanderings in distant lands. The poem
is constructed on the principles of contrast and parallelism. By
holding to this method of structure throughout Lowell sacrificed the
important artistic element of unity, especially in breaking the
narrative with the Prelude to the second part. The first Prelude
describing the beauty and inspiring joy of spring, typifying the
buoyant youth and aspiring soul of Sir Launfal, corresponds to the
second Prelude, describing the bleakness and desolation of winter,
typifying the old age and desolated life of the hero. But beneath the
surface of this wintry age there is a new soul of summer beauty, the
warm love of suffering humanity, just as beneath the surface of the
frozen brook there is an ice-palace of summer beauty. In Part First
the gloomy castle with its joyless interior stands as the only cold and
forbidding thing in the landscape, "like an outpost of winter;" so in
Part Second the same castle with Christmas joys within is the only
bright and gladsome object in the landscape. In Part First the castle
gates never "might opened be"; in Part Second the "castle gates stand
open now." And thus the student may find various details
contrasted and paralleled. The symbolic meaning must be kept
constantly in mind, or it will escape unobserved; for example, the
cost of earthly things in comparison with the generosity of June
corresponds to the churlish castle opposed to the inviting warmth of
summer; and each symbolizes the proud, selfish, misguided heart of
Sir Launfal in youth, in comparison with the humility and large
Christian charity in old age. The student should search for these
symbolic hints, passages in which "more is meant than meets the
ear," but if he does not find all that the poet may or may not have
intended in his dreamy design, there need be no detraction from the
enjoyment of the poem.
Critical judgment upon The Vision of Sir Launfal is generally severe
in respect to its structural faults. Mr. Greenslet declares that
"through half a century, nine readers out of ten have mistaken
Lowell's meaning," even the "numerous commentators" have
"interpreted the poem as if the young knight actually adventured
the quest and returned from it at the end of years, broken and old."
This, however, must be regarded as a rather exaggerated estimate of
the lack of unity and consistency in the poem. Stedman says: "I think
that The Vision of Sir Launfal owed its success quite as much to a
presentation of nature as to its misty legend. It really is a landscape
poem, of which the lovely passage, 'And what is so rare as a day in
June?' and the wintry prelude to Part Second, are the specific
features." And the English critic, J. Churton Collins, thinks that "Sir
Launfal, except for the beautiful nature pictures, scarcely rises above
the level of an Ingoldsby Legend."
The popular judgment of the poem (which after all is the important
judgment) is fairly stated by Mr. Greenslet: "There is probably no
poem in American literature in which a visionary faculty like that
[of Lowell] is expressed with such a firm command of poetic
background and variety of music as in Sir Launfal ... its structure is
far from perfect; yet for all that it has stood the searching test of
time: it is beloved now by thousands of young American readers,
for whom it has been a first initiation to the beauty of poetic
idealism."
While studying The Vision of Sir Launfal the student should be
made familiar with Tennyson's Sir Galahad and The Holy Grail, and
the libretto of Wagner's Parsifal. Also Henry A. Abbey's magnificent
series of mural paintings in the Boston Public Library, representing
the Quest of the Holy Grail, may be utilized in the Copley Prints. If
possible the story of Sir Galahad's search for the Grail in the
seventeenth book of Sir Thomas Malory's Morte Darthur should be
read. It would be well also to read Longfellow's King Robert of
Sicily, which to some extent presents a likeness of motive and
treatment.
THE COMMEMORATION ODE
In April, 1, the Civil War was ended and peace was declared. On
July 21 Harvard College held a solemn service in commemoration of
her ninety-three sons who had been killed in the war. Eight of these
fallen young heroes were of Lowell's own kindred. Personal grief
thus added intensity to the deep passion of his utterance upon this
great occasion. He was invited to give a poem, and the ode which he
presented proved to be the supreme event of the noble service. The
scene is thus described by Francis H. Underwood, who was in the
audience:
"The services took place in the open air, in the presence of a great
assembly. Prominent among the speakers were Major-General
Meade, the hero of Gettysburg, and Major-General Devens. The
wounds of the war were still fresh and bleeding, and the interest of
the occasion was deep and thrilling. The summer afternoon was
drawing to its close when the poet began the recital of the ode. No
living audience could for the first time follow with intelligent
appreciation the delivery of such a poem. To be sure, it had its
obvious strong points and its sonorous charms; but, like all the later
poems of the author, it is full of condensed thought and requires
study. The reader to-day finds many passages whose force and
beauty escaped him during the recital, but the effect of the poem at
the time was overpowering. The face of the poet, always singularly
expressive, was on this occasion almost transfigured—glowing, as if
with an inward light. It was impossible to look away from it. Our
age has furnished many great historic scenes, but this
Commemoration combined the elements of grandeur and pathos,
and produced an impression as lasting as life."
Of the delivery and immediate effect of the poem Mr. Greenslet
says: "Some in the audience were thrilled and shaken by it, as
Lowell himself was shaken in its delivery, yet he seems to have felt
with some reason that it was not a complete and immediate success.
Nor is this cause for wonder. The passion of the poem was too ideal,
its woven harmonies too subtle to be readily communicated to so
large an audience, mastered and mellowed though it was by a single
deep mood. Nor was Lowell's elocution quite that of the deep-
mouthed odist capable of interpreting such organ tones of verse. But
no sooner was the poem published, with the matchless Lincoln
strophe inserted, than its greatness and nobility were manifest."
The circumstances connected with the writing of the ode have been
described by Lowell in his private letters. It appears that he was
reluctant to undertake the task, and for several weeks his mind
utterly refused to respond to the high duty put upon it. At last the
sublime thought came to him upon the swift wings of inspiration.
"The ode itself," he says, "was an improvisation. Two days before the
commemoration I had told my friend Child that it was impossible—
that I was dull as a door-mat. But the next day something gave me a
jog, and the whole thing came out of me with a rush. I sat up all
night writing it out clear, and took it on the morning of the day to
Child." In another letter he says: "The poem was written with a
vehement speed, which I thought I had lost in the skirts of my
professor's gown. Till within two days of the celebration I was
hopelessly dumb, and then it all came with a rush, literally making
me lean (mi fece magro), and so nervous that I was weeks in getting
over it." In a note in Scudder's biography of Lowell (Vol. II., p. ), it is
stated upon the authority of Mrs. Lowell that the poem was begun
at ten o'clock the night before the commemoration day, and finished
at four o'clock in the morning. "She opened her eyes to see him
standing haggard, actually wasted by the stress of labor and the
excitement which had carried him through a poem full of passion
and fire, of five hundred and twenty-three lines, in the space of six
hours."
Critical estimates are essentially in accord as to the deep significance
and permanent poetic worth of this poem. Greenslet, the latest
biographer of Lowell, says that the ode, "if not his most perfect, is
surely his noblest and most splendid work," and adds: "Until the
dream of human brotherhood is forgotten, the echo of its large
music will not wholly die away." Professor Beers declares it to be,
"although uneven, one of the finest occasional poems in the
language, and the most important contribution which our Civil War
has made to song." Of its exalted patriotism, George William Curtis
says: "The patriotic heart of America throbs forever in Lincoln's
Gettysburg address. But nowhere in literature is there a more
magnificent and majestic personification of a country whose name is
sacred to its children, nowhere a profounder passion of patriotic
loyalty, than in the closing lines of the Commemoration Ode. The
American whose heart, swayed by that lofty music, does not thrill
and palpitate with solemn joy and high resolve does not yet know
what it is to be an American."
With the praise of a discriminating criticism Stedman discusses the
ode in his Poets of America: "Another poet would have composed a
less unequal ode; no American could have glorified it with braver
passages, with whiter heat, with language and imagery so befitting
impassioned thought. Tried by the rule that a true poet is at his best
with the greatest theme, Lowell's strength is indisputable. The ode is
no smooth-cut verse from Pentelicus, but a mass of rugged quartz,
beautiful with prismatic crystals, and deep veined here and there
with virgin gold. The early strophes, though opening with a fine
abrupt line, 'weak-winged is song,' are scarcely firm and incisive.
Lowell had to work up to his theme. In the third division, 'Many
loved Truth, and lavished life's best oil,' he struck upon a new and
musical intonation of the tenderest thoughts. The quaver of this
melodious interlude carries the ode along, until the great strophe is
reached,—
Such was he, our Martyr-Chief,
in which the man, Abraham Lincoln, whose death had but just
closed the national tragedy, is delineated in a manner that gives this
poet a preëminence, among those who capture likeness in enduring
verse, that we award to Velasquez among those who fasten it upon
the canvas. 'One of Plutarch's men' is before us, face to face; an
historic character whom Lowell fully comprehended, and to whose
height he reached in this great strophe. Scarcely less fine is his
tearful, yet transfiguring, Avete to the sacred dead of the
Commemoration. The weaker divisions of the production furnish a
background to these passages, and at the close the poet rises with
the invocation,—
'Bow down, dear Land, for thou hast found release!'
a strain which shows that when Lowell determinedly sets his mouth
to the trumpet, the blast is that of Roncesvalles."
W.C. Brownell, the latest critic of Lowell's poetry, says of this poem:
"The ode is too long, its evolution is defective, it contains verbiage, it
preaches. But passages of it—the most famous having
characteristically been interpolated after its delivery—are equal to
anything of the kind. The temptation to quote from it is hard to
withstand. It is the cap-sheaf of Lowell's achievement." In this ode
"he reaches, if he does not throughout maintain, his own 'clear-
ethered height' and his verse has the elevation of ecstasy and the
splendor of the sublime."
The versification of this poem should be studied with some
particularity. Of the forms of lyric expression the ode is the most
elaborate and dignified. It is adapted only to lofty themes and
stately occasions. Great liberty is allowed in the choice and
arrangement of its meter, rhymes, and stanzaic forms, that its varied
form and movement may follow the changing phases of the
sentiment and passion called forth by the theme. Lowell has given
us an account of his own consideration of this matter. "My problem,"
he says, "was to contrive a measure which should not be tedious by
uniformity, which should vary with varying moods, in which the
transitions (including those of the voice) should be managed
without jar. I at first thought of mixed rhymed and blank verses of
unequal measures, like those in the choruses of Samson Agonistes,
which are in the main masterly. Of course, Milton deliberately
departed from that stricter form of Greek chorus to which it was
bound quite as much (I suspect) by the law of its musical
accompaniment as by any sense of symmetry. I wrote some stanzas
of the Commemoration Ode on this theory at first, leaving some
verses without a rhyme to match. But my ear was better pleased
when the rhyme, coming at a longer interval, as a far-off echo rather
than instant reverberation, produced the same effect almost, and yet
was gratified by unexpectedly recalling an association and faint
reminiscence of consonance."
THE POETS' TRIBUTES TO LOWELL
THE VISION OF SIR LAUNFAL
AND OTHER POEMS
THE VISION OF SIR LAUNFAL
PRELUDE TO PART FIRST
Over his keys the musing organist,
Beginning doubtfully and far away,
First lets his fingers wander as they list,
And builds a bridge from Dreamland for his lay:
Then, as the touch of his loved instrument
Gives hope and fervor, nearer draws his theme,
First guessed by faint auroral flushes sent
Along the wavering vista of his dream.
Not only around our infancy
Doth heaven with all its splendors lie;
Daily, with souls that cringe and plot,
We Sinais, climb and know it not.
Over our manhood bend the skies;
Against our fallen and traitor lives
The great winds utter prophecies;
With our faint hearts the mountain strives;
Its arms outstretched, the druid wood
Waits with its benedicite;
And to our age's drowsy blood
Still shouts the inspiring sea.
Earth gets its price for what Earth gives us;
The beggar is taxed for a corner to die in,
The priest hath his fee who comes and shrives us,
We bargain for the graves we lie in:
At the Devil's booth are all things sold,
Each ounce of dross costs its ounce of gold;
For a cap and bells our lives we pay,
Bubbles we buy with a whole soul's tasking
'T is heaven alone that is given away,
'T is only God may be had for the asking;
No price is set on the lavish summer;
June may be had by the poorest comer.
And what is so rare as a day in June?
Then, if ever, come perfect days;
Then Heaven tries the earth if it be in tune,
And over it softly her warm ear lays:
Whether we look, or whether we listen,
We hear life murmur, or see it glisten;
Every clod feels a stir of might,
An instinct within it that reaches and towers,
And, groping blindly above it for light,
Climbs to a soul in grass and flowers;
The flush of life may well be seen
Thrilling back over hills and valleys;
The cowslip startles in meadows green,
The buttercup catches the sun in its chalice,
And there's never a leaf nor a blade too mean
To be some happy creature's palace;
The little bird sits at his door in the sun,
Atilt like a blossom among the leaves,
And lets his illumined being o'errun
With the deluge of summer it receives;
His mate feels the eggs beneath her wings,
And the heart in her dumb breast flutters and sings;
He sings to the wide world, and she to her nest,—
In the nice ear of Nature which song is the best?
Now is the high-tide of the year
And whatever of life hath ebbed away
Comes flooding back, with a ripply cheer,
Into every bare inlet and creek and bay;
Now the heart is so full that a drop overfills it,
We are happy now, because God wills it;
No matter how barren the past may have been,
'T is enough for us now that the leaves are green;
We sit in the warm shade and feel right well
How the sap creeps up and the blossoms swell;
We may shut our eyes, but we cannot help knowing
That skies are clear and grass is growing:
The breeze comes whispering in our ear
That dandelions are blossoming near,
That maize has sprouted, that streams are flowing,
That the river is bluer than the sky,
That the robin is plastering his house hard by;
And if the breeze kept the good news back,
For other couriers we should not lack;
We could guess it all by yon heifer's lowing,—
And hark! how clear bold chanticleer,
Warmed with the new wine of the year,
Tells all in his lusty crowing!
Joy comes, grief goes, we know not how;
Everything is happy now,
Everything is upward striving;
'T is as easy now for the heart to be true
As for grass to be green or skies to be blue,—
'T is the natural way of living:
Who knows whither the clouds have fled?
In the unscarred heaven they leave no wake;
And the eyes forget the tears they have shed,
The heart forgets its sorrow and ache;
The soul partakes the season's youth,
And the sulphurous rifts of passion and woe
Lie deep 'neath a silence pure and smooth,
Like burnt-out craters healed with snow.
What wonder if Sir Launfal now
Remembered the keeping of his vow?
